One of the most common queries we get from homeowners looking for property investment advice is, “Should I sell my home or should I keep it as an investment property”?
As any property specialist will tell you, there is no single yes or no answer to this, because organising an investment property really depends on a variety of factors, including the individual circumstances of the property buyer.
When you’re looking for a home to live in, it’s common that you could see a house for sale that you fall in love with. In fact, having an emotional response to an owner-occupied property seems natural, as most people really want to like where they’re going to live. This is quite a different approach to buying an investment property, which should involve a business approach like understanding rental yields and negative gearing benefits.
So why would you keep your current home as an investment property when you move to your new home?
Well the number one reason would be an emotional attachment. Something in our thinking tells us “Well if I like this property, everyone else should too”. This seems to be a common trend. A recent analysis of quantity surveyor reports prepared by BMT Tax Depreciation indicated that 22% of their schedules were for primary places of residence (PPOR) which the owners turned into an investment property.
One logical reason to turn your home into an investment property would be if you were temporarily relocating for work reasons or perhaps exploring other lifestyle options.
An example of this is the sometimes romantic notion of sea change and tree change, where people usually aim to leave the stresses of city life to wind down to an easier pace, or to enjoy more of a holiday lifestyle. The wise thing to do for people considering such a change in lifestyle would be to keep their current home (and rent it out) and rent a property in the new location to see if they like it.
Over the years we’ve heard stories of people selling up in expensive areas like Sydney, buying in a quieter location and discovering that the lifestyle was not what they thought, or there were limited employment opportunities. In the meantime, property prices where they originally lived increased and supply tightened, to the extent where they couldn’t afford to buy real estate back in the same area where they lived before!
But what about the majority of people who are thinking about keeping their existing home as an investment property and want to buy their new home in the same city or town?
Well if there is no debt involved and extra funds aren’t needed for the new PPOR, it could work, but this is not so common. Most people with a home have a mortgage, and loan repayments (including interest) is the biggest expense of many Australian households.
If you pay a significant amount of debt off your existing home, keep it as an investment property and need to borrow much more for the new home, then your loans will end up being ‘upside down” for tax purposes. This is because the interest on the smaller existing home loan will end up becoming tax deductible, whereas the larger new home loan will not be tax deductible.
So, should you keep your existing home as an investment property if you’re borrowing to buy a new home in the same city or town? 9 times out of 10 the answer is no.
The logical approach from a tax perspective would be to sell your existing home to minimise the debt on your new home. You could then borrow to buy an investment property in the future and the interest on that new investment property loan will be tax deductible.
Your existing home is usually exempt from capital gains tax if you sell it as well, so you should discuss this and any other tax implications of keeping your home as an investment property with your accountant.
Unfortunately, our choices aren’t always based on logic, especially when it challenges our emotional instincts.